| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 13 | |
| 2. |  | MACEDO, I.; ROEL, A.; AYALA, W.; PRAVIA, V.; TERRA, J.A.; PITTELKOW, C.M. 207-4. Rice rotations affect soil organic carbon sequestration and rice yield in a temperate region of South America. [Abstract] Soil Carbon and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Community. ASA Section: Environmental Quality. In: ASA, CSSA, SSSA International Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, UT. 2021. https://scisoc.confex.com/scisoc/2021am/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/134305 Abstract citation: Macedo, I., Roel, A., Ayala, W., Pravia, M. V., Terra, J. A., & Pittelkow, C. M. (2021). Rice Rotations Affect Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration and Rice Yield in a Temperate Region of South America [Abstract]....| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| 3. | | MACEDO, I.; ROEL, A.; VELAZCO, J.I.; BORDAGORRI, A.; TERRA, J.A.; PITTELKOW, C.M. Intensification of rice-pasture rotations with annual crops reduces the stability of sustainability across productivity, economic, and environmental indicators. Agricultural Systems, October 2022, volume 202, Article Number 103488. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103488 Article history: Received 6 May 2022, Revised 17 August 2022, Accepted 19 August 2022, Available online 30 August 2022, Version of Record 30 August 2022.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|  |
| 5. | | ZHANG, Z.; MACEDO, I.; LINQUIST, B.A.; SANDER, B. O.; PITTELKOW, C.M. Opportunities for mitigating net system greenhouse gas emissions in Southeast Asian rice production: A systematic review. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2024, Volume 361, article 108812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108812 Article history: Received 28 June 2023; Received in revised form 13 September 2023; Accepted 8 November 2023; Available online 21 November 2023. -- Correspondence: Z. Zhang, E-mail address: hcizhang@ucdavis.edu --| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| 6. | | MACEDO, I.; PITTELKOW, C.M.; TERRA, J.A.; CASTILLO, J.; ROEL, A. The power of on-farm data for improved agronomy. Global Food Security. 2024, Volume 40, 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2024.100752 -- OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received 24 November 2023, Revised 27 February 2024, Accepted 3 March 2024, Available online 16 March 2024, Version of Record 16 March 2024. -- Correspondence: Macedo, I.; Department of Plant Sciences, Univ. of...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 7. | | TSENG, C-M.; ROEL, A.; MACEDO, I.; MARELLA, M.; TERRA, J.A.; PITTELKOW, C. M. Synergies and tradeoffs among yield, resource use efficiency, and environmental footprint indicators in rice systems. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 2021, volume 3, 100070. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070 Article history: Received 30 April 2021 / / Revised 12 July 2021 // Accepted 13 July 2021 // Available online 24 July 2021.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 8. | | TSENG, M.C.; ROEL, A.; MARELLA, M.; ZORRILLA DE SAN MARTÍN, G.; TERRA, J.A.; PITTELKOW, C.M. Assessment of yield gaps using field-level data in Uruguay. [Abstract]. In: International Temperate Rice Conference (7., 2020, Pelotas, RS), Science & Innovation: feeding a world of 10 billion people: proceedings. Pelotas RS, Brasil, February 9-12, 2020. Brasília, DF : Embrapa, 2020.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 9. | | TSENG, M.C.; ROEL, A.; MACEDO, I.; MARELLA, M.; TERRA, J.A.; ZORRILLA DE SAN MARTÍN, G.; PITTELKOW, C. M. Field-level factors for closing yield gaps in high-yielding rice systems of Uruguay. Field Crops Research, February 2021, vol. 264, no. 108097. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108097 12 p. Article history: Received 9 April 2020 / Received in revised form 12 January 2021 / Accepted 5 February 2021 / Available online 24 February 2021.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 10. | | PITTELKOW, C.M.; ZORRILLA DE SAN MARTÍN, G.; TERRA, J.A.; RICCETTO, S.; MACEDO, I.; BONILLA, C.; ROEL, A. Sustainability of rice intensification in Uruguay from 1993 to 2013. Global Food Security, 2016, v. 9, p. 10-18. Article history: Received 2 February 2016, Received in revised form 4 May 2016, Accepted 6 May 2016.
Have a Supplementary material| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 11. | | PITTELKOW, C.M.; ZORRILLA DE SAN MARTÍN, G.; TERRA, J.A.; RICCETTO, S.; MACEDO, I.; BONILLA, C.; ROEL, A. Sostenibilidad de la intensificación arrocera en el Uruguay desde 1993 al 2013. ln: JORNADA ANUAL ARROZ, 2016, INIA TREINTA Y TRES, TREINTA Y TRES, UY. Arroz: resultados experimentales 2015-2016. Treinta y Tres, (Uruguay): INIA, 2016. cap. 4, p. 7-10. (Serie Actividades de Difusión; 765) Acceso a la presentación oral del trabajo A. Roel.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 12. | | ROEL, A.; TERRA, J.A.; ZORRILLA DE SAN MARTÍN, G.; MARELLA, M.; TSENG, M.C.; PITTELKOW, C.M. Rice productivity and resource use efficiencies in Uruguay. [Abstract]. In: International Temperate Rice Conference (7., 2020, Pelotas, RS), Science & Innovation: feeding a world of 10 billion people: proceedings. Pelotas RS, Brasil, February 9-12, 2020. Brasília, DF : Embrapa, 2020.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 13 | |
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
26/07/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
26/07/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
-- - -- |
|
Autor : |
TSENG, C-M.; ROEL, A.; MACEDO, I.; MARELLA, M.; TERRA, J.A.; PITTELKOW, C. M. |
|
Afiliación : |
MENG-CHUN TSENG, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA; ALVARO ROEL DELLAZOPPA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; IGNACIO MACEDO YAPOR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MUZIO MARELLA, Sociedad Anónima Molinos Arroceros Nacionales (SAMAN), Uruguay; JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CAMERON M. PITTELKOW, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA. |
|
Título : |
Synergies and tradeoffs among yield, resource use efficiency, and environmental footprint indicators in rice systems. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 2021, volume 3, 100070. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 30 April 2021 / / Revised 12 July 2021 // Accepted 13 July 2021 // Available online 24 July 2021. |
|
Contenido : |
A major question facing global rice systems is the extent to which yield and resource use efficiency indicators can be simultaneously optimized to sustainably meet future food demand. However, research approaches for evaluating synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators have been limited to date. Using the case study of rice production in Uruguay, we quantified five cropping system performance indicators at the farm-level from 2012 to 2017, covering approximately 40% of national rice area. Results suggest that maximizing performance in one
indicator is associated with tradeoffs for other indicators, with no farm simultaneously ranking as a topperformer (defined as top 10% of farms) across all indicators. The gaps between the average and topperforming farms were largest for agrochemical contamination risk (33%) and smallest for yield (11%). Comparing the groups of top-performing farms within each indicator revealed opportunities for improving system-level performance via synergistic effects between yield and resource use efficiencies, but not between carbon footprint, agrochemical contamination risk, and other indicators. Importantly, synergistic effects were more pronounced for farms at lower compared to higher productivity levels, suggesting less room for ustainability improvements at higher yield levels, unless yields can be further increased without elevated inputs. Important factors to improve the aggregated sustainability index included N fertilizer rate and seeding date. With potential application to rice production systems worldwide, this study highlights an integrated research approach for quantifying synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators to understand opportunities for increasing crop yields without negatively impacting resource use efficiency and environmental footprint. MenosA major question facing global rice systems is the extent to which yield and resource use efficiency indicators can be simultaneously optimized to sustainably meet future food demand. However, research approaches for evaluating synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators have been limited to date. Using the case study of rice production in Uruguay, we quantified five cropping system performance indicators at the farm-level from 2012 to 2017, covering approximately 40% of national rice area. Results suggest that maximizing performance in one
indicator is associated with tradeoffs for other indicators, with no farm simultaneously ranking as a topperformer (defined as top 10% of farms) across all indicators. The gaps between the average and topperforming farms were largest for agrochemical contamination risk (33%) and smallest for yield (11%). Comparing the groups of top-performing farms within each indicator revealed opportunities for improving system-level performance via synergistic effects between yield and resource use efficiencies, but not between carbon footprint, agrochemical contamination risk, and other indicators. Importantly, synergistic effects were more pronounced for farms at lower compared to higher productivity levels, suggesting less room for ustainability improvements at higher yield levels, unless yields can be further increased without elevated inputs. Important factors to improve the aggregated sustainability index included N fertilizer rate and seed... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; NITROGEN USE EFFICIENCE; RICE; SUSTAINABILITY; TRADEOFFS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
P01 Conservación de la naturaleza y recursos de La tierra |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/15908/1/Current-Research-Environmental-Sustainability-2021-3-100070.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049021000463
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02847naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1062325
005 2021-07-26
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070$2DOI
100 1 $aTSENG, C-M.
245 $aSynergies and tradeoffs among yield, resource use efficiency, and environmental footprint indicators in rice systems.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Received 30 April 2021 / / Revised 12 July 2021 // Accepted 13 July 2021 // Available online 24 July 2021.
520 $aA major question facing global rice systems is the extent to which yield and resource use efficiency indicators can be simultaneously optimized to sustainably meet future food demand. However, research approaches for evaluating synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators have been limited to date. Using the case study of rice production in Uruguay, we quantified five cropping system performance indicators at the farm-level from 2012 to 2017, covering approximately 40% of national rice area. Results suggest that maximizing performance in one indicator is associated with tradeoffs for other indicators, with no farm simultaneously ranking as a topperformer (defined as top 10% of farms) across all indicators. The gaps between the average and topperforming farms were largest for agrochemical contamination risk (33%) and smallest for yield (11%). Comparing the groups of top-performing farms within each indicator revealed opportunities for improving system-level performance via synergistic effects between yield and resource use efficiencies, but not between carbon footprint, agrochemical contamination risk, and other indicators. Importantly, synergistic effects were more pronounced for farms at lower compared to higher productivity levels, suggesting less room for ustainability improvements at higher yield levels, unless yields can be further increased without elevated inputs. Important factors to improve the aggregated sustainability index included N fertilizer rate and seeding date. With potential application to rice production systems worldwide, this study highlights an integrated research approach for quantifying synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators to understand opportunities for increasing crop yields without negatively impacting resource use efficiency and environmental footprint.
653 $aCARBON FOOTPRINT
653 $aENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
653 $aNITROGEN USE EFFICIENCE
653 $aRICE
653 $aSUSTAINABILITY
653 $aTRADEOFFS
700 1 $aROEL, A.
700 1 $aMACEDO, I.
700 1 $aMARELLA, M.
700 1 $aTERRA, J.A.
700 1 $aPITTELKOW, C. M.
773 $tCurrent Research in Environmental Sustainability, 2021, volume 3, 100070. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
